Lola Mimosa

[Quality Time]

Can anybody tell me if this chick is for real?

http://www.soloindependientes.com/escorts-acompanantes/Lola%20Mimosa_15-6193-6369_827.htm

[SunSeeker]

Can anybody tell me if this chick is for real?

http://www.soloindependientes.com/escorts-acompanantes/Lola%20Mimosa_15-6193-6369_827. HtmI've had some pm's with her but was never able to set things up. According to the local foro 500p, no anal, BBBJ, good reviews.

If you see a chica from BG or SI you should look them up on the BG-SI foro as there will usually be a writeup on them.

[Abelardo]

Can anybody tell me if this chick is for real?

http://www.soloindependientes.com/escorts-acompanantes/Lola

%20Mimosa_15-6193-6369_827. HtmIf you read spanish, google the above website and you'll see posts of local experiences with Lola, all positive.

[Dickhead]

you'll see posts of local experiences with Lola, all positive.Of course, because all negative reviews are promptly stifled.

[Daddy Rulz]

If you read spanish, google the above website and you'll see posts of local experiences with Lola, all positive.Put zero stock on reviews in their own website. Very often when girl A stops paying for her ad, and they want to put girl B up they will just change picture and phone numbers. The reviews at Solo or Baires girls, or any of the escort website occasionally will be accurate but more often they are nothing but marketing.

[Abelardo]

Put zero stock on reviews in their own website. Very often when girl A stops paying for her ad, and they want to put girl B up they will just change picture and phone numbers. The reviews at Solo or Baires girls, or any of the escort website occasionally will be accurate but more often they are nothing but marketing.The question was "Is she for real"?

I just answered that apparently she is.

Quality of service is a sub-issue.

[Daddy Rulz]

The question was "Is she for real"?

I just answered that apparently she is.

Quality of service is a sub-issue.Please accept my appologies for posting off topic with useful information I thought somebody new to BsAs would find helpful. I'll refrain in the future. Good luck with your trip.

[Mpexy]

The question was "Is she for real"?

I just answered that apparently she is.

Quality of service is a sub-issue.Actually you didn't. All you replied to support your "apparently she is" was "If you read spanish, google the above website and you'll see posts of local experiences with Lola, all positive."

You did not support with first hand or even second hand source from established, local forum user with history. Simply pointed to embedded reviews within the providers own ad site. Once you spend any time in bsas or read this board more, you'll find there are two popular local foros that provide very reliable reviews that frequently contradict the self promo or pure propaganda you see as "reviews" on the chicks own ad site.

DR's reply to you was simply pointing out the same. That using these anon (because unlike the other actual local foros you can't see or establish poster history and credibility) reviews on the chicas own ad site is unreliable and not proof of anything.

Now, this chica in particular does have decent reviews from established locals on the two most popular independent local foros. Based on last month reviews, she's a 500p provider that looks reasonably decent compared to photos, some locals rate her photoshop as minimal 10%, some more, but no one crying foul with massive delta between photo and live. Services are also rated generally positive with bbbj but no cim or near mouth outside. Non clock watcher but does generally stick to session time

The above is credible because it was sourced from independent local foros that have a track record for being on the whole reasonably credible. Especially if you further research the specific poster for history and track record of credibility. You pointing to random scribblings - because that's all they are worth - of on-chica-ad-site reviews are not proof or support of anything

You took DR's shorter and more concise pointing out of same thing I'm detailing here and replied with a foolish no-support to your affirmation with for want of better term a 'snarky' attitude.

[Abelardo]

Actually you didn't. All you replied to support your "apparently she is" was "If you read spanish, google the above website and you'll see posts of local experiences with Lola, all positive."

You did not support with first hand or even second hand source from established, local forum user with history. Simply pointed to embedded reviews within the providers own ad site. Once you spend any time in bsas or read this board more, you'll find there are two popular local foros that provide very reliable reviews that frequently contradict the self promo or pure propaganda you see as "reviews" on the chicks own ad site.

DR's reply to you was simply pointing out the same. That using these anon (because unlike the other actual local foros you can't see or establish poster history and credibility) reviews on the chicas own ad site is unreliable and not proof of anything.

Now, this chica in particular does have decent reviews from established locals on the two most popular independent local foros. Based on last month reviews, she's a 500p provider that looks reasonably decent compared to photos, some locals rate her photoshop as minimal 10, some more, but no one crying foul with massive delta between photo and live. Services are also rated generally positive with BBBJ but no cim or near mouth outside. Non clock watcher but does generally stick to session time.

The above is credible because it was sourced from independent local foros that have a track record for being on the whole reasonably credible. Especially if you further research the specific poster for history and track record of credibility. You pointing to random scribblings. Because that's all they are worth. Of on-chica-ad-site reviews are not proof or support of anything

You took DR's shorter and more concise pointing out of same thing I'm detailing here and replied with a foolish no-support to your affirmation with for want of better term a 'snarky' attitude.Good research. That's exactly the local post I had in mind when I first replied (I believe from foro-escorts, the hyphenated one,

The other one is not reliable).

Born and raised here more than five decades ago, I know the local deceptive practices. It's amusing to read that I should spend more time in BA. But that is the risk of brief postings, which may be taken the wrong way. Did not mean to offend anyone.

Now, having said that, I think I'm ready for a beer.

[Mpexy]

Good research. That's exactly the local post I had in mind when I first replied (I believe from foro-escorts, the hyphenated one,

The other one is not reliable).

Born and raised here more than five decades ago, I know the local deceptive practices. It's amusing to read that I should spend more time in BA. But that is the risk of brief postings, which may be taken the wrong way. Did not mean to offend anyone.

Now, having said that, I think I'm ready for a beer.I like both. Foro-escorts and foroescorts.

There's some overlap but one has lot more concentrated bg, soloind site gals while hyphen one seems more spread out

Both are equally weak relatively speaking for privado chick xps but given how fast, often, and with so many names used, don't really hold that against either local foro.

May not apply to you per se, but there are obviously life long residents of various places that have no real in-the-know experience. We all know people like that. Time is not a substitute for experience as much as some people may wish